Category Archives: Policy Analysis

Report: 20% of Americans Are Now On Food Stamps

ebt card

ebt cardNow, over 20% of Americans rely on the government for some type of assistance. Over 47 million people reported receiving food stamps in March of 2013. In fact, food stamp recipients outnumber the people in 24 states and the District of Columbia.

With so many programs in place to keep people receiving benefits, there is less and less motivation for them to get off of the system. Considering the government refuses to allow jobs to be created, many are forced on to food stamps and are economically stuck.

The end result, of course, is that the average, working taxpayer is stuck to foot the bill with funds withdrawn from their wages to support these programs. This is all part of the plan — create more economic division, more poverty, more desperation, and more resentment.

The availability of food stamps in many states is as easy and meeting a certain income requirement and filling out paperwork. A program designed to aid people in receiving the most basic of human necessities is often seen as a way to get something for nothing.

People often stay on these programs for years at a time because it’s a free service that is as easy as filling out paperwork. The qualifications continue to lower, and it’s becoming easier to obtain food stamps.

Food stamps were intended only to be used for basic food items to supplement a tight budget. Food stamps can now be used to be things that are luxury items. It’s becoming common to see signs at convenience stores that say “EBT Accepted.”

Fraud is another issue that is plagues the food stamp system. Struggling families often sell EBT cards for cash to buy other items. For example, an EBT card with $400 worth of food benefits may sell on the street for $200 cash.

The intended recipient keeps the cash while someone else is shopping at a discounted rate, courtesy of the U.S. government. Fraud is the biggest problem facing EBT benefits.

Some are gaming EBT cards for $7,000.

The USDA is advertising EBT cards to illegal immigrants.

A system that is so easy to obtain and defraud will not encourage people to ever stop doing it.

USDA Advertises Food Stamps to Illegal Immigrants

ebt card

ebt cardJust when you thought the obvious political corruption couldn’t get any worse, well, it just did. The USDA has apparently been spending tax-payer dollars advertising in Spanish, explaining that they won’t check the “immigration status” of people applying for food stamps. In other words, they’re trying to encourage illegal immigrants to get on the welfare system.

The reasoning for this is fairly obvious — this is a long-term investment in government dependence. By law, children born in the US are US citizens, meaning if they can create as much of an incentive for families on welfare to grow, then they get more future voters.

This doesn’t mean everyone on welfare votes Democrat, nor does it mean that every illegal will take advantage of it. But the math is unavoidable — this creates voters, it creates dependence, and it makes the “lower taxes and spending” platform impossible over time. This is political corruption… with your money.

This is an emotional topic for some, because they support free-market immigration policies — if people want to work for a living, they should be allowed to do so, so long as they go through the proper legal channels. This, however, has nothing to do with corruption and theft being encouraged by the federal government.

Regardless of your stance on immigration, it should be incredibly obvious that stealing from citizens to give to non-citizens is morally indefensible. But doing it for political power over time? That’s a level of political corruption that would make the Chinese blush.

Meanwhile, people on food stamps are hitting all-time highs. At least 47,000,000 Americans are now on food stamps. The people on food stamps and welfare in America outnumber most of the countries in the history of civilization. If you want an example of an unsustainable economy, this is it.

For an example of more corruption, read how some people are getting $7,000 on EBT cards.

Of course, the goal isn’t to fix the economy. The goal is to break it. When people are hungry and desperate, they’re far more open to a “fundamental transformation” of the economy and the political system. Hold on, everyone — things are going to get a heck of a lot worse.

John McCain Says He’ll Help Bring Gun Control “Back”

john mccain

john mccainOver the last few months, we’ve hit John McCain almost on a daily basis. There’s a reason for this. He’s attacked Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, he’s said he has “more in common” with Barack Obama, and he literally dined with Obama while Rand was filibustering him.

In the end, he even voted for the final gun bill — in defiance of the American people who don’t want the constitution trampled on. This man’s loyalty to liberty is non-existent. Some people get offended at this being said, but quite frankly it’s time we get more offended at liberty being attacked.

This is NOT a question of party. This is a question of liberty, of the constitution, of self-defense, of stopping criminals, and of protecting our families. He wasn’t alone, of course. Sen. Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, openly bragged that they’re going to bring the anti-gun legislation back for a victory. Here are the full quotes, from the US News and World Report:

“My own little prediction – I think we’re going to bring this bill back before the end of the year and I think you may find some changes,” said Schumer, during a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. “We may change the bill a little bit – but I think you may find some changes out there in the public. Lots of senators who thought it was safe to vote against it because of the intensity are not so sure anymore.”

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., one of four Republicans to vote in support of the measure, called the proposal “common sense,” even though it wasn’t precisely what he would have crafted.

“But I do agree with Chuck that I think the issue is going to come back,” he said at the same event.

“I do agree with Chuck that I think the issue is going to come back.”

It’s time to end John McCain’s career. He has no business having lunch with patriots like Rand Paul, much less having access to political power. He’ll continue to slash the constitution, violate the rights of the people, and put our rights under target. Fire John McCain.

In politics, everything is a question of what senators and representatives think will impact polls. That means the more viral our anger, the more likely the cowardly “maybe” votes won’t cave. Make this go viral: share it on Facebook and Twitter.

Congress is Trying to Exempt Itself From Obamacare

boehner obama

boehner obamaObamacare is one of the most insane and corrupt pieces of legislation out of DC in decades, and that’s saying a lot. It’s filled with a bizarre mix of cronyism, socialism, and every other broken political philosophy. The only thing it doesn’t do is help people out — the only thing they promised it would.

We know it’s going to explode the deficit. We know that when it fails, they’ll blame the “free market”, which is a joke. But now we’re finding out that congress is trying to exempt itself and its staff from having to comply with Obamacare. The goal? Different rules for you than for them.

Like Mark Twain said, “It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.”

Politico reports:

Congressional leaders in both parties are engaged in high-level, confidential talks about exempting lawmakers and Capitol Hill aides from the insurance exchanges they are mandated to join as part of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, sources in both parties said.

The talks — which involve Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the Obama administration and other top lawmakers — are extraordinarily sensitive, with both sides acutely aware of the potential for political fallout from giving carve-outs from the hugely controversial law to 535 lawmakers and thousands of their aides. Discussions have stretched out for months, sources said.

Someone asked us recently why we attack Boehner and McCain almost as much as Obama. The answer should be obvious: they’re also part of the problem.

This is NOT a Democrat or Republican issue — this is a Democrat and Republican issue. This is why we absolutely must support congressmen and senators like Justin Amash, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz — the old guard has to go.

These people have earned their hideous approval rating. America hates congress for a reason — they’re corrupt, despicable  and are motivated only by power and theft.

Obama’s legacy will be one of Obamacare, and it will be that of failure — but people have to know about it first. Please share this on Facebook and Twitter so people can wake up and see what corruption is going on with Obamacare.

Obama’s Plan to Cap Retirement Accounts Won’t Apply to Him

obama tyrant

obama tyrantThis shouldn’t surprise anyone who is used to keeping up with the “convenient” way things are done in DC. Apparently, Obama’s plan to cap retirement accounts won’t apply to his own pension, as Breitbart has pointed out..

First, a little background. Obama’s budget proposal has a collection of massive tax increases on the middle class. The goal is to raise $1.1 trillion in new taxes. Part of that plan is a cap on retirement accounts, as we’ve written about in the past:

“The plan is to cap retirement accounts at $3 million per account. If you think that’ll stay the same and they’ll never lower that amount until the middle class is hurt, well, I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.”

So how does it work? It caps how much money you can store in a tax deferred retirement account — but don’t worry, Obama’s pension won’t be touched. SF Gate reports:

The limit would not apply to Obama’s own pension, which is worth at least $5 million, because it is not in a tax-advantaged account, according to Brian Graff, executive director of the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries. Obama’s pension, which guarantees him a Cabinet-level salary for life indexed to inflation, is a “non-qualified deferred compensation plan, similar to what corporate executives get,” he says.

The proposal would not cap those plans or prevent corporate executives from walking away with retirement packages worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, Graff says. But it could discourage some small- and mid-size business owners from continuing to contribute to employee retirement plans when their own balances hit $3 million, he says.

In other words, Obama is making sure that he and big donors aren’t hit — but small businesses and the middle class are fair game. Class warfare exists, but it’s not between rich and poor — it’s between the political class and everyone else. Pathetic.

Rick Harrison from Pawn Stars was right: there’s a war on small business, and Obama is leading the current wave. Click here to read more about Obama’s plan.

Don’t forget, this is only one of many of Obama’s plans to raise taxes on the middle class. Overall, he’s trying to raise $1.1 TRILLION in more taxes from an already struggling economy. That’s economic suicide. It’s important that we make this sting when it comes to political capital — please spread this on Facebook and Twitter to get the word out.

Bloomberg: Constitution “Will Have to Change” After Bombings

bloomberg

bloombergOnce again, nanny-state apologist and advocate Michael Bloomberg has shown that he has no respect for the rule of law, for the natural or constitutional rights of the people, or any idea of how the constitution should be interpreted.

In a fearful reaction to the Boston terrorist attack, Bloomberg said:

“We live in a complex world where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”

Such an approach to the constitution completely misses the point. If Bloomberg wants to actually “change” the constitution, then he can propose an amendment. Of course, he’s not going to do that because his goal is something else entirely.

He doesn’t want a constitution that protects the people — he wants a government that isn’t constrained by the constitution at all.

That’s why these people never actually try to amendment the document. They aren’t trying to “fix it”. They’re trying to destroy it.

Rand Paul had some choice words for people like Michael Bloomberg, and wrote on his Facebook account:

“If we surrender liberty for security, we gain neither. If we surrender the Constitution out of fear, the terrorists win.”

Well said. We can’t drop the constitution because of one terrorist attack. Talk about caving to terrorism. It’s absurd and ridiculous. We should be defending the constitution stronger than ever before — that’s what the terrorists don’t want, and that’s what people who believe in liberty do want.

Boston Police: The Bombers Didn’t Have Legal Gun Permits

Tamerlan and Dzokhar Tsarnaev

Tamerlan and Dzokhar TsarnaevThere’s an old saying: “Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result.” Gun control doesn’t work. It never has. It never will. In fact, the stronger the gun control measure, the more it actually backfires — making things worse.

The UK banned handguns, and their handgun crime went up. DC passed a handgun ban and quickly became the murder capitol of the world. Chicago is, well, it’s Chicago — a safe haven for criminals who aren’t afraid of being shot by homeowners.

Now, the Boston police are saying that the two bombers who were in a shootout in Boston didn’t have the legal permits required to have the guns. In other words, their guns were illegal. Apparently, people who break laws don’t follow the law. That I even have to say this is annoying — that’s how foolish anti-gun positions are.

Meanwhile, the entire situation in Boston is a good example of why I do own guns. When your family is at risk, and the police can’t find an armed and desperate criminal, then you have to defend yourself. Sometimes, it’s the only answer.

There are other reasons to own AR-15 and AK-47 styled semi-automatic rifles, as we’ve talked about before in our column on the facts that Obama doesn’t want you to know about gun control.

McCain Admits He Often Has “More in Common” With Obama

john mccain

john mccainJohn McCain was the candidate against Obama in 2008. Some wonder why the GOP was completely obliterated, though some of us understand exactly why. The distinction between McCain and Obama was too close for many Americans to tell, so they went with the only one who was openly a liberal — Obama.

McCain has been stabbing rising libertarian and conservative leaders since before many young activists were ever involved in politics. Now, McCain has openly admitted that:

“There are times these days when I feel that I have more in common on foreign policy with President Obama than I do with some in my own party.”

It’s important to understand that the Internet has changed politics. We can now see what politicians are actually doing — not just what the mainstream media decides we should know. Because of this, long-time frauds like McCain are sinking because we’re able to see how deep the corruption and power-hungry policies really go.

There’s a civil war being waged in the GOP right now. One side has McCain and Graham — their goal is to move beyond the constitution for the sake of “security”. Then there’s Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz. They’re defending the constitution because they understand that’s the only way to actually achieve security and liberty at the same time.

Remember, this man was eating with Obama while Rand Paul was filibustering Obama.

We’re rooting for the constitution and the rights of Americans. Who do you stand with?

Marco Rubio’s Immigration Plan Includes… Free Phones

marcorubio

marcorubioOur position is identical on all questions of increasing government spending, taxes, or regulation: we don’t support it. We can’t afford it. We’re going to pay dearly for every dime of debt we have right now.

Welfare abuse is running rampant. A huge portion of America is on food stamps. And now, the new immigration plan includes “free” cell phones. Of course, we know they’re not free.

The reasoning listed in the bill is that the phones are because “emergencies” sometimes happen. The end result, however, are taxpayer funded phones for some people that the rest of the country is forced — at gunpoint by the IRS — to pay for. This is wrong. No excuse will rationalize it.

Here’s the text of the bill in question, on page 43 and 44:

SEC. 1107. ACCESS TO EMERGENCY PERSONNEL.

(a) SOUTHWEST BORDER REGION EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS GRANTS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation with the governors of the States in the South- west Border region, shall establish a 2-year grant program, to be administered by the Secretary, to im- prove emergency communications in the Southwest Border region.

(2) ELIGIBILITY FOR GRANTS.—An individual is eligible to receive a grant under this subsection if the individual demonstrates that he or she—

(A) regularly resides or works in the Southwest Border region;

(B) is at greater risk of border violence due to the lack of cellular service at his or her residence or business and his or her proximity to the Southern border.

(3) USE OF GRANTS.—Grants awarded under this subsection may be used to purchase satellite telephone communications systems and service that—(A) can provide access to 9–1–1 service;and(B) are equipped with global positioning systems.

(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the grant program established under this subsection.

Thanks for Breitbart and Shark Tank for pointing this out. This is the absolute wrong direction to go. We shouldn’t be providing people anywhere with free phones. If free phones are necessary, by that logic, we should go ahead and have socialized medicine and everything else.

This is not a principled policy position for someone who believes in the free market. This is compromise with those who want people to get used to the government providing them with everything they want — by forcing you to pay for it. It’s wrong.

What do you think of the plan? Explain below:

Obama Sends 140,000 Cans of Teargas to Muslim Brotherhood

egypt protester

egypt protesterAt this point, essentially nothing the federal government does is surprising. It’s currently in the business of stealing from Americans to prop up dictators with $250,000,000 in essentially cash, US-made F-16 fighter jets and tanks, and even corrupt military deals with the government of Russia. It’s part of how DC works.

The latest is that the US just sent 140,000 canisters of teargas to Egypt, which is ruled by a dictatorial Muslim Brotherhood. The Egyptians have been groaning under the tyrannical regime. The teargas is specifically to quell any uprisings or riots against radical Islam. In other words, the US government is essentially in a war against the people of Egypt — taking sides with the Muslim Brotherhood.

If you want an example of why people hate us, there are many reasons. This is one of them. If we continue to prop up the tyrants with taxpayer money, we achieve absolutely nothing other than suffering for some of the most vulnerable people in the world. This is as evil as it gets.

How The US Supplied the Teargas

The UPI reports that the US shipment is only for use by the tyrannical Egyptian government:

“The Egyptian Interior Ministry in February agreed to pay $2.4 million for tear gas from the United States. The Egyptian Independent news agency reports that documents its reviewed indicate the shipment arrived Sunday and state that tear gas is for exclusive use by the Egyptian government.”

In other words, we are now making sure that the people of Egypt must suffer rather than overthrow a dictator who is part of the Muslim Brotherhood. To say this is “evil” is an understatement. The only political benefit to this is apparently just keeping tyrants in power.

The US government is admitting that they’ve facilitated the use. Read the State Department’s official statement:

“[W]e have approved an export license for the shipment of U.S.-manufactured nonlethal riot control agents to the Egyptian Government… we condemn any misuse of these products, of teargas that can result in injury or unlawful death, and any such misuse would jeopardize future exports.”

A shocked reporter asked the State Department official, “But has there not been misuse in Egypt over the last two to three years?

I think we know the answer. The answer is “yes”, and the Obama administration knows this. And they don’t care. If anything, the misuse is the point. Sickening. Claims that they don’t support the “misuse” is simply them flaunting that they’re doing exactly that.

Obama is now having his administration directly facilitate the attacks on peaceful protesters in a country ruled by the Muslim Brotherhood. Remember, Osama bin Laden was essentially an offshoot of this radical group, and has the same theology — just different political tactics.

We’ve written about how evil this movement is in the past. Apparently, the US government is making a stand… only to defend them.

The media has been almost completely silent about this. Please share this on Facebook and Twitter. In the past, activism has gotten the media to talk about topics they were ignoring. Let’s do it again. Let’s make this go viral.Why This Matters

Copyright Capitalism Institute, 2011-present.