Petraeus Bombshell: The Administration Censored The Benghazi Truth

November 16, 2012

The Benghazi terror attacks were a concerted, organized attack by terror cells on the United States. It happened on 9/11 of 2012. It was, in a sense, the second volley of 9/11. Only this time, Mr. Obama was president, and he betrayed us all every step of the way, intentionally, for weeks. This is the true story of the Benghazi terror attacks.

Our readers will note that through the month of September, we were beside ourselves with the way the administration handled the attacks. First, they blamed the freedom of speech. Then, they “detained” the supposed director of a video making fun of Muhammad. Then, it turns out they essentially had originally forced the Marines and the ex-SEALs in the area to leave, requiring our ambassador to Libya be grossly undefended, before the attacks even began. Rand Paul correctly asked, “Where the hell were the Marines?”

But now, news is coming out that is worse than everything else, because it shows that this wasn’t just incompetent leadership. It was something darker and more sinister. General David Petraeus has testified that he knew the attacks were terror all along, but “someone” in the administration censored his message. In other words, the attacks on the video and the claims it was a “spontaneous riot” weren’t just wrong — they were lies.

So who changed the talking points? Everyone conveniently forgets. Rep. King says the administration apparently is having a memory problem:

“Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., told Fox News that intelligence officials who testified in a closed-door hearing a day earlier, including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Acting CIA Director Mike Morell, said they did not know who changed the talking points. He said they went out to multiple departments, including the State Department, National Security Council, Justice Department and White House.”

So what does this mean? Considering Obama met with his security staff within minutes of the attacks, and that he obviously would keep up with his CIA director’s view of an attack that was plastering the news for weeks, this means only one thing: Obama intentionally tried to cover up the terror attack as just being a protest.

Why the lies? There’s no telling. Obama thought his election would “fundamentally transform” our foreign policy, even though he continued the interventions and dronings. Perhaps he just didn’t want the wildcard to impact the election. There’s no telling. And why there was a lie doesn’t change that there still was one to hundreds of millions of people.

At this point, we have the information we need to know what has happened. Will anything come of it? I have no idea. But one thing is certain: we’ve been lied to, they’ve been busted, and people need to lose their jobs over this.

Copyright Capitalism Institute, 2011-present.